linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH diagnostic] Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- RCU problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <173065.89301.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Witbrodt <dawitbro@...global.net>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH diagnostic] Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- RCU problem



> > Well, I was hoping to see something interesting.  I ran it with parameters
> > "debug initcall_debug", and it locked up at the same place.  I let it for
> > 15 minutes, in case of some delayed reaction.  Nada.
> 
> Interesting.  The causes could be:
> 
> o    Scheduling-clock interrupts aren't happening, as Ingo suggested.

Does anyone have a short answer to this question:  Were the changes between
2.6.25 and 2.6.26 so major that interrupts are NOW being used that were not
being used before?

Again, I don't even pretend to understand the kernel's inner workings, but
2.6.25 _did_ work on this hardware... and with HPET enabled.


DW
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/