[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080811134413.014ddcf2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:44:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Marcin Obara" <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpm@...horst.net, kjhall@...ibm.com,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.26-mmotm
tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion-d820-fix.patch
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:27:33 +0100
"Marcin Obara" <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 2008/7/26 <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>:
> > + if (chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] == 1)
> > + chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] *= 1000;
> > +
> > chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
> > usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
> > (*((__be32 *) (data +
>
>
> Value in chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] is in jiffies not in milliseconds.
> (As I know it's not the same. Jiffy is in range 1-10 ms.)
> I know the result may be the same, but it is unclear.
>
> Maybe... value should be compared (to 1000) before conversion?
> or...
> If after conversion, there should be something like this:
> if (chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] < (HZ/100)) /* less
> than 10ms ? */
> chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] = HZ;
>
> What do you think?
>
This all seemed to die off without a conclusion.
Here's the current
tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion.patch. Does it need
updating?
Thanks.
From: Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
This patch fixes timeouts conversion to jiffies, by replacing
msecs_to_jiffies() calls with usecs_to_jiffies(). According to TCG TPM
Specification Version 1.2 Revision 103 (pages 166, 167) TPM timeouts and
durations are returned in microseconds (usec) not in miliseconds (msec).
Signed-off-by: Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Marcel Selhorst <tpm@...horst.net>
Cc: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c~tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c~tpm-correct-tpm-timeouts-to-jiffies-conversion
+++ a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
@@ -525,19 +525,19 @@ void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *c
timeout =
be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (data + TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_1_IDX)));
if (timeout)
- chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
timeout =
be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (data + TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_2_IDX)));
if (timeout)
- chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
timeout =
be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (data + TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_3_IDX)));
if (timeout)
- chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
timeout =
be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (data + TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_4_IDX)));
if (timeout)
- chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(timeout);
duration:
memcpy(data, tpm_cap, sizeof(tpm_cap));
@@ -554,15 +554,15 @@ duration:
return;
chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
- msecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
+ usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
(*((__be32 *) (data +
TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_1_IDX))));
chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
- msecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
+ usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
(*((__be32 *) (data +
TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_2_IDX))));
chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] =
- msecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
+ usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu
(*((__be32 *) (data +
TPM_GET_CAP_RET_UINT32_3_IDX))));
}
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists