[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811175415.x7st9tf2ssg8og40@cubmail.cc.columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:54:15 -0400
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: checkpoint/restart ABI
Quoting Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Arnd, Jeremy and Oren,
>
> Thanks for all of the very interesting comments about the ABI.
I second that !
>
> Considering that we're still *really* early in getting this concept
> merged up into mainline, what do you all think we should do now?
>
> My main goal here is just to get everyone to understand the approach
> that we're proposing rather than to really fix the interfaces in stone.
> I bet we're going to be changing them a lot before these patches
> actually get in.
I closely follow the valuable feedback and fix the code accordingly.
I propose to extend the proof of concept, to also be able to save and
restore "simple" open files (regular files, directories). My motivation
is twofold:
(1) Providing eough functionality for people to meaningfully play
with the proposed patches and try them.
(2) Demonstrate how I propose to handle shared resources (open files).
The first point is very important because it makes the concept actually
useful to a much broader set of programs than otherwise. I hope this
will attract a larger audience :)
To this end, I have already extended the patchset, and I should be
able to send something working in a day or two.
Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists