linux-kernel - Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48A0B905.20603@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:17 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

Kok, Auke wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
> 
>>From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
>>Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:33:43 -0500
>>
>>
>>>Maybe what we are seeing is general bloat in kernel execution paths
>>>due to the growth in complexity?
>>
>>It could be, and any kind of analysis into this would be great.
> 
> 
> perhaps Rick Jones who maintains netperf could enlighten us on some historic
> numbers? he usually seems to be happy to prop up new netperf numbers :)

While this is an excellent opening to talk about how netperf 
top-of-trunk can now emit keyword=value results easier (ostensibly) to 
put into a database then the regular or even CSV output formats, I 
cannot fully exploit it by pointing at a database of results :(

rick jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/