[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808111618.02765.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:18:02 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNP: make the resource type an unsigned long
On Monday 11 August 2008 04:08:18 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > I see hpa's point that it makes no functional difference, but I do
> > think it's worthwhile to make the types match. I don't want to
> > debug the problem that happens when somebody adds an IORESOURCE_*
> > flag in the upper bits.
>
> Then half the platforms break anyway.
>
> We should change this to an explicit type.
Are you suggesting a change to the "unsigned long flags" in struct
resource, or a different change to pnp_resource_type()?
The struct resource change sounds reasonable, but I think neither
Rene nor I want to sign up to do that right now.
Whatever we have in struct resource, I think it makes sense to use
the same type everywhere we reference the "flags" element. I think
you're saying "it doesn't matter in this case that we use different
types." But I, as a code reader, would rather not have to spend the
mental energy to convince myself that you're right.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists