[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A0C213.4090305@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:49:55 -0700
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc1 for set_cpus_allowed_ptr
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com> wrote:
>
>>> And I was hoping to do -rc3 today. Can I please have pull-requests for the
>>> appropriate urgent scheduler/x86 fixes? Or should I just take these as
>>> patches?
>> It'd be nice if -rc3 included my cpuset patch so that we could put circular
>> locking issues in the cpu hotplug path to the rest.
>> Ingo, I'm talking about this:
>> [PATCH] cpuset: Rework sched domains and CPU hotplug handling (take 4)
>
> the latest (-v4) version of the patch was submitted just half an hour
> ago and it's rather large/complex, with a few unrelated changes
> (whitespace, etc.) mixed in as well. I'd like to wait for Paul's final
> ack for -v4 (he has already agreed with the approach in general), and
> wanted to have it tested myself as well, at least minimally.
Fair enough.
btw Whitespace and other cosmetic changes were requested by reviewers.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists