[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080811165816.679cfdb9@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:58:16 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, S K <nospamnoham@...il.com>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:33:17 +0200
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:11:28AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 1) when the cpu is idle (as in "idle loop C states/hlt"; p4_clockmod
> > doesn't mean anything.. the clock is stopped not just skipped.
> > 2) when the cpu is executing code (eg non-idle), it takes more power
> > for a unit of time than it takes when it's idle
>
> This statement might be true, but might also be wrong:
> a) on systems where only C1 is exported, p4-clockmod most
> often equals the state the CPU is in when in C1[*],
that's.. not entirely true btw.
>so we're in a
> win-win, or lose-lose situation.
even if it were EXACTLY identical (which it isn't).. you would be at
BEST a tie... not a savings. so it's lose-lose or tie-tie, but never win
> b) IIRC 50% throttling is not "execute-one-statement
> skip-one-statement execute-one-statement, etc." but instead
> work for N us, skip for N us, work for N us, etc.
> Therefore, the situation is a bit more compilcated.
doesn't change the fundamental math though.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists