linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080811100807.GA8184@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:08:07 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeremy@...p.org,
	hugh@...itas.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] lockdep


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This series is my pending lockdep queue, it includes David's graph 
> optimization, my new scheduler runqueue annotation amongst others.
> 
> The part that makes this RFC are the latter few patches that add the 
> "lock protection locks" thing Linus proposed a few days ago. I've not 
> yet written a test case that actively tests this functionality, but 
> wanted to get this out so that Jeremy can see if it works for him.

update: i'm now back from vacation and i've added these patches to 
tip/core/locking, but -tip testing found a few problems with them so i 
wont push them upstream yet.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/