linux-kernel - Re: Resolved merge conflicts in next-creds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22136.1218533228@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:27:08 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Resolved merge conflicts in next-creds

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> The important thing (and what is different in what I have proposed) is
> that what you are asking Linus to take here has zero impact (i.e. you just
> add a header file that noone uses and whose contents are clearly noops)
> and then it is very obvious that when people start to use it, the changes
> really cannot introduce a regression.

Actually, you do have to modify XFS too.  It declares current_fsuid(),
current_fsgid() and struct cred within itself.  The first two just require
some simple renames, and the third just requires using my struct cred instead
when it appears.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/