linux-kernel - Re: Possible false positive in checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m3wsim3yft.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:01:10 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Cc:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible false positive in checkpatch

Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> writes:

> The recommendations it makes match the style of the whole, which new
> contributions should follow.

But there isn't any "style of the whole". Existing styles differ.
While I guess there is some agreement about the base (tab width,
mostly K&R, don't do "char* ptr" etc.), the rest are simply views of
single persons.
This is IMHO fine as long as it's useful for the community, but not
past this point.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/