[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080812220722.GE12911@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:07:22 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Deguara, Joachim" <joachim.deguara@....com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01][retry 1] x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26
> > > + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> > > + unsigned int reg = 0;
> > > +
> > > + pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + i * 4, ®);
> > > +
> > > + ret += sprintf(buf, "%s %x\t", buf, reg);
> > > + }
> > > + ret += sprintf(buf,"%s\n", buf);
> >
> > So you print "buf" few times? Why? And you use both \t and \n
> > as deliminer...
>
> I'm printing the values of the two config registers into
> the string buffer, separated by tabs, and terminated by
> an EOL. Is there a prefered way to do that instead of
> what I have?
Hmm, I misparsed that.
Yes, we have some helpers for sysfs writing... SEQ_printf(), IIRC.
Is this even valid C?
ret += sprintf(buf, "%s %x\t", buf, reg);
You are printing into buffer you are passing as argument. That seems
fragile.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists