linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/01][retry 1] x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080812225319.GA12373@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:53:19 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	"Deguara, Joachim" <joachim.deguara@....com>, gregkh@....cz,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/01][retry 1] x86: L3 cache index disable for 2.6.26

On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:01:46PM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
> > > +        for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> > > +                unsigned int reg = 0;
> > > +
> > > +                pci_read_config_dword(dev, 0x1BC + i * 4, &reg);
> > > +
> > > +                ret += sprintf(buf, "%s %x\t", buf, reg);
> > > +        }
> > > +	ret += sprintf(buf,"%s\n", buf);
> > 
> > So you print "buf" few times? Why? And you use both \t and \n 
> > as deliminer...
> 
> I'm printing the values of the two config registers into
> the string buffer, separated by tabs, and terminated by
> an EOL.  Is there a prefered way to do that instead of
> what I have?

Yes, two different files, one for each config register.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/