[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813075236.GA8052@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:52:36 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch]fastboot: remove duplicate unpack_to_rootfs()
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> the dry_run variable is now unused in unpack_to_rootfs() and could be
> eliminated.
also, while we are materially touching init/initramfs.c, that file has
collected a few uglies in the past few years, checkpatch --file says:
total: 7 errors, 7 warnings, 3 checks, 562 lines checked
it has a few other problems as well that can be seen if you look at the
file. Unused macros:
/* Diagnostic functions (stubbed out) */
#define Assert(cond,msg)
#define Trace(x)
#define Tracev(x)
#define Tracevv(x)
#define Tracec(c,x)
#define Tracecv(c,x)
#define STATIC static
#define INIT __init
lots of no-newline-after-variable-definitions instances:
{
int written;
dry_run = check_only;
no-newline-before-return:
kfree(header_buf);
return message;
}
so it would be nice to start off with a cleanup [strictly no code
changed] patch.
then it also has an absolutely crazy turn-error-printouts-off hack:
static __initdata char *message;
static void __init error(char *x)
{
if (!message)
message = x;
}
which is unobvious, 100% unused and should be removed.
those error()s should be pr_debug() perhaps. [this should be a second
cleanup patch as it changes the code]
Hm?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists