[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813095643.GA27074@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:56:43 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86_64 UV: Use LED to indicate CPU is active
Hi!
> > +/*
> > + * Illuminate "activity" LED when CPU is going "active",
> > + * extinguish when going "idle".
> > + */
> > +static int uv_idle(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *junk)
> > +{
> > + if (action == IDLE_START)
> > + uv_set_led_bits(0, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
> > +
> > + else if (action == IDLE_END)
> > + uv_set_led_bits(LED_CPU_ACTIVITY, LED_CPU_ACTIVITY);
> > +
> > + return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct notifier_block uv_idle_notifier = {
> > + .notifier_call = uv_idle,
> > +};
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Initialize idle led callback function
> > + */
> > +static __init void uv_init_led_idle_display(void)
> > +{
> > + /* initialize timer for activity monitor */
> > + idle_notifier_register(&uv_idle_notifier);
> > +}
>
> hm, i think this is a bad idea. While putting it into the go-to-idle
Plus this really should not be uv-specific. We already have generic
triggers.
And you should really CC led maintainers!
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists