[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080812175635.GA6153@ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:56:36 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Moulder <Peter.Moulder@...otech.monash.edu.au>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] typesafe callbacks?
Hi!
> Well, noone else voiced great enthusiasm about typesafe callbacks. I esp.
> like them because we can use them to wean off unsigned long in timer
> callbacks without a flag day.
>
> Should I just drop these patches, or leave them in -next for a third round?
> Rusty.
I think it is a great idea..
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists