[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A2FC17.9070302@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:21:59 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hugh@...itas.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
briangrant@...gle.com, cgd@...gle.com, mbligh@...gle.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: pthread_create() slow for many threads; also time to revisit
64b context switch optimization?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i find it pretty unacceptable these days that we limit any aspect of
> pure 64-bit apps in any way to 4GB (or any other 32-bit-ish limit).
Sure, but if we can pin-point the sub-archs for which it is the problem
then a flag to optionally request it is even easier to handle. You'd
simply ignore the flag for anything but the P4 architecture.
I personally have no problem removing the whole thing because I have no
such machine running anymore. But there are people out there who have.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkii/BcACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHQ8FACfZFV+WaBmS6UNqZZ/xDfV/Z7z
gIAAoJSmbauchdaIVIebz8N2rPrszAMF
=WAzJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists