[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A30140.9040704@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:44:00 +0200
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, teheo@...ell.com
Subject: Re: Power management for SCSI
Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 13 August 2008 16:59:23 schrieb Alan Stern:
[Quoting Oliver: true SCSI busses can be shared. So are we using the
correct approach?]
>> This is a good question. Most USB mass-storage devices do not act as a
>> true SCSI bus, but I believe there are a few non-standard ones that do
>> -- the USB device really contains a SCSI host and arbitrary SCSI
>
> OK, but does it make sense to have SCSI autosuspend? Or should autosuspend
> operate on the bus the _host_ is connected to (usb, pci, ...)?
In Alan's patch, SCSI calls scsi_host_template methods (if the LLD
provides ones) to suspend and resume a Scsi_Host. The LLD can use them
to work with the underlying infrastructure to determine what can be done
at that time. I.e. are there other protocols or other initiator-like
nodes sharing the link? If yes or if "maybe yes", the infrastructure
keeps the link up. If not, it can move it into a low-power state.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists