| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1218646065.3540.75.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:47:45 -0400 From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net, andi@...stfloor.org, riel@...hat.com, greg@...ah.com, tytso@....edu, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, arjan@...radead.org, peterz@...radead.org, hch@...radead.org Subject: Re: TALPA - a threat model? well sorta. On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 17:24 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > So, what is it that anti-malware companies do? They scan files. That's > > it. > > Good so lets instead have a discussion about making the file event > notification more scalable. That is the same thing I want for content > indexing. It is the same thing you want for certain kinds of smart > archiving, for on-line asynchronous backup and other stuff. > > It ought to be a simple clean syscall interface. Are you willing to make it blocking? I'm not sure how to make what we have capable of assuring that the object you got a notification about is actually the object you are acting on. Thoughts on how to accomplish that? I'm here to code and I'm willing to throw all my work in the garbage if someone can show me how to actually do it better. -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists