[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A31188.4050904@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:53:28 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: invalidate caches before going into suspend
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> also, we might be safer if the wbinvd(), the CLI and the halt was in a
> single assembly sequence:
>
> if (cpu >= i486)
> asm ("cli; wbinvd; cli; 1: hlt; jmp 1b")
> else
> asm ("cli; 1: hlt; jmp 1b")
>
> to make sure the compiler doesnt ever insert something into this
> codepath? [ And note the double cli which would be further
> robustification - in theory we could get a spurious interrupt straight
> after the wbinvd. ] Hm?
>
Spurious interrupt of what kind? The only things that could come in
would not be non-INT type interrupts, and those aren't affected by CLI.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists