[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080813093935G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:45:53 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: joerg.roedel@....com
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
muli@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86: add free_coherent dma_ops callback to GART
driver
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:24:12 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
> index 55cc388..18db09b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-gart_64.c
It would be better to foil this to the first patch, I think. Any
reasonable reason to add alloc_coherent and free_coherent with two
separate patches?
I think that you can remove map_simple in gart (and please don't
forget to remove map_simple in struct dma_mapping_ops. I think only
GART uses that hook).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists