[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080813024701.GA19201@verge.net.au>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:47:04 +1000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec jump: fix code size checking
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 09:04:35AM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> Fix building issue when CONFIG_KEXEC=n. Thanks to Vivek Goyal for his
> reminding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>
> ---
> include/asm-x86/kexec.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/kexec.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> # define KEXEC_CONTROL_CODE_MAX_SIZE 2048
> +# ifndef CONFIG_KEXEC
> +# define kexec_control_code_size 0
> +# endif
> #endif
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
Is it impossible to skip the linker check in the !CONFIG_KEXEC case?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists