[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080812204900.db63deaa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:49:00 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
mingo@...e.hu, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 1/7] kexec jump: clean up #ifdef and comments
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:14:21 +0800 Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> xchg(&kexec_lock, 0);
kernel/kexec.c: In function 'kernel_kexec':
kernel/kexec.c:1501: warning: value computed is not used
Is there any reason why we cannot use the more conventional
test_and_set_bit() etc, rather than this peculiarity?
Or perhaps spin_trylock?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists