[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1218701835-17327-2-git-send-email-aaronc@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:17:13 +1000
From: Aaron Carroll <aaronc@...ato.unsw.edu.au>
To: jens.axboe@...cle.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] deadline-iosched: allow non-sequential batching
Deadline currently only batches sector-contiguous requests, so except
for a few circumstances (e.g. requests in a single direction), it is
essentially first come first served. This is bad for throughput, so
change it to CSCAN, which means requests in a batch do not need to be
sequential and are issued in increasing sector order.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Carroll <aaronc@...ato.unsw.edu.au>
---
block/deadline-iosched.c | 14 +++-----------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/deadline-iosched.c b/block/deadline-iosched.c
index 342448c..07b80e4 100644
--- a/block/deadline-iosched.c
+++ b/block/deadline-iosched.c
@@ -258,17 +258,9 @@ static int deadline_dispatch_requests(struct request_queue *q, int force)
else
rq = dd->next_rq[READ];
- if (rq) {
- /* we have a "next request" */
-
- if (dd->last_sector != rq->sector)
- /* end the batch on a non sequential request */
- dd->batching += dd->fifo_batch;
-
- if (dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch)
- /* we are still entitled to batch */
- goto dispatch_request;
- }
+ if (rq && dd->batching < dd->fifo_batch)
+ /* we have a next request are still entitled to batch */
+ goto dispatch_request;
/*
* at this point we are not running a batch. select the appropriate
--
1.5.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists