[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080814012515.GA4215@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:25:15 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jbaron@...hat.com,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joe@...ches.com, nick@...k-andrew.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] dynamic debug v2 - infrastructure
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:54:25PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:00:47PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:38:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 06:16:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:08:04 -0700
> > > > Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 01:09:08PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > > So close, can I have a good changelog comment with the patch so people
> > > > > > > know what it is when they look in the logs?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Care to resend it with that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Base infrastructure to enable per-module debug messages.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ah, so close...
> > > > >
> > > > > With this patch, I get the following build error:
> > > > >
> > > > > CC [M] drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.o
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c: In function ___gether_setup___:
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: ___KBUILD_MODNAME___ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: unknown field ___Usage___ specified in initializer
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected expression before ___.___ token
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: initializer element is not constant
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: (near initialization for ___descriptor.hash___)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: ___Usage___ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary << (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary & (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary << (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: invalid operands to binary & (have ___long long int___ and ___char *___)
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___:___ token
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: warning: passing argument 4 of _____dynamic_dbg_enabled_helper___ makes integer from pointer without a cast
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: error: expected ___)___ before ___KBUILD_MODNAME___
> > > >
> > > > (lol at gcc crap)
> > > >
> > > > > drivers/usb/gadget/u_ether.c:787: warning: too few arguments for format
> > > >
> > > > argh, not that again. We had this with a patch from Jesse a while
> > > > back, which I fixed thusly:
> > >
> > > <patch moving KBUILD_MODNAME from a inline function to a macro snipped>
> > >
> > > Yeah, I remember that too, but in this case, KBUILD_MODNAME is being
> > > used in a macro, not an inline function, the exact opposite.
> > >
> > > Sam, any ideas here? I'll bounce the original patch at you if you
> > > missed it last time.
> >
> > I have not looked into the particular error but what happens is
> > that u_ether.o is used by more than one module so kbuild does
> > not know what value to assign the KBUILD_MODNAME and therefore
> > decide not to assign KBUILD_MODNAME at all.
>
> Ick.
>
> Hm, how do I fix this? Build u_ether.c into two different .o files,
> depending on which module it is being included into?
>
> Or do:
> #include "u_ether.c"
> in the source code that was linking it in?
>
> Actually, as ugly as that last one is, it probably would solve this
> issue, and be the same end-result, right?
Argh, that code is just horrible!!!
I'll go split this up into separate sub-modules, like it really needs to
be. That will solve this problem.
Bah, why do people make things so hard...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists