linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 alternatives : fix LOCK_PREFIX race with preemptible kernel and CPU hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080814151805.GA29507@Krystal>
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:18:05 -0400
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 alternatives : fix LOCK_PREFIX race with
	preemptible kernel and CPU hotplug

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@...p.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> A virtualized guest kernel could use that to limit its use of the
>> overall machine CPU resources in different time periods. Policies can
>> determine how many physical CPU a virtual machine can be tied to, and
>> that may change depending on e.g. the workload or time of day. Having
>> the ability to efficiently switch to UP for a long period of time seems
>> important in this use-case.
>
> Not very convinced.  Unplugging cpus is a pretty coarse way to control 
> resource use.  There are lots of other mechanisms.  And it's not like an 
> uncontended lock is all that expensive these days...
>
>    J
>

I can't argue about the benefit of using VM CPU pinning to manage
resources because I don't use it myself, but I ran some tests out of
curiosity to find if uncontended locks were that cheap, and it turns out
they aren't. Here are the results :

Xeon 2.0GHz


Summary

                  no lock prefix (s)   with lock prefix (s)    Speedup
make -j1 kernel/      33.94 +/- 0.07         34.91 +/- 0.27      2.8 %
hackbench 50           2.99 +/- 0.01          3.74 +/- 0.01     25.1 %

Detail :


1 CPU, replace smp lock prefixes with DS segment selector prefixes

make -j1 kernel/

real	0m34.067s
user	0m30.630s
sys	0m2.980s

real	0m33.867s
user	0m30.582s
sys	0m3.024s

real	0m33.939s
user	0m30.738s
sys	0m2.876s

real	0m33.913s
user	0m30.806s
sys	0m2.808s

avg : 33.94s
std. dev. : 0.07s

hackbench 50

Time: 2.978
Time: 2.982
Time: 3.010
Time: 2.984
Time: 2.982

avg : 2.99
std. dev. : 0.01



1 CPU, noreplace-smp

make -j1 kernel/

real	0m35.326s
user	0m30.630s
sys	0m3.260s

real	0m34.325s
user	0m30.802s
sys	0m3.084s

real	0m35.568s
user	0m30.722s
sys	0m3.168s

real	0m34.435s
user	0m30.886s
sys	0m2.996s

avg.: 34.91s
std. dev. : 0.27s

hackbench 50

Time: 3.733
Time: 3.750
Time: 3.761
Time: 3.737
Time: 3.741

avg : 3.74
std. dev. : 0.01

Mathieu


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/