linux-kernel - Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080814211756.GC13814@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2008 23:17:56 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 05:00:56PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Btrfs defaults                  57.41 MB/s
> Btrfs dup no csum               74.59 MB/s 

With duplications checksums seem to be quite costly (CPU bound?)

> Btrfs no duplication            76.83 MB/s
> Btrfs no dup no csum no inline  76.85 MB/s

But without duplication they are basically free here at least
in IO rate. Seems odd?

Does it compute them twice in the duplication case perhaps?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/