linux-kernel - Re: Core kernel parameters and /sys/parameters?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080814222522.GO30057@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:25:22 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	arjan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Core kernel parameters and /sys/parameters?

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 01:59:02PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
>    Was looking at implementing "core_param" for things like "initcall_debug"
> (ie. params with no prefix), and wanted to put them in sysfs of course.  I
> hacked in a new "kernel" dir, but /sys/module/kernel/parameters/ is a bit
> of an odd place for it to end up in.
> 
>    I noticed this comment in params.c:
> 
>  * /sys/module/[mod->name]/parameters to /sys/parameters/[mod->name]/
> 
> I like the idea of /sys/parameters/ much better (perhaps even with core
> parameters at the top level).  Is this obsolete?  Planned?

Did I write that comment?  I sure don't remember it, sorry :)

I don't have any plans on changing this, but I do know people use the
/sys/module/MODULE_NAME/parameters interface today, why change it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/