[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A4C25E.2060405@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:40:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Bruce Duncan <bwduncan@...il.com>,
Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] ftrace: enable mcount recording for modules
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Friday 15 August 2008 05:45:09 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
>> This patch enables the loading of the __mcount_section of modules and
>> changing all the callers of mcount into nops.
>>
> ...
>
>> + if (mcountindex) {
>> + void *mseg = (void *)sechdrs[mcountindex].sh_addr;
>> + ftrace_init_module(mseg, mseg + sechdrs[mcountindex].sh_size);
>>
>
> You don't actually need the if. The size of section 0 is 0.
>
Thanks,
But I find the if is a bit more clear. It may confuse code reviewers if
we expect them to know that sechdrs[0].sh_size is zero. This isn't a hot
path.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists