[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080814002305.GA7359@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:23:05 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Marcin Obara <marcin_obara@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 08:48:19PM +0100, Marcin Obara wrote:
> 2008/8/13 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> >> GET_VERSION is called frequently
> >
> > Why? Shouldn't it only be called once?
> Once per connection. But you can have many clients connecting.
Is that a real issue?
> >> With ioctl - only one file handle is used, and userspace client logic
> >> is simpler.
> >
> > But the kernel is messier and we are trying to not add any more ioctls
> > to it. Especially for trivial things like the version number of the
> > hardware device.
> It's rather protocol version (=running software version) supported by
> hardware device.
> Hmmm, I just didn't know that there is something wrong with ioctls.
There always have been :)
> >> Normal flow looks like:
> >>
> >> open
> >> ioctl(GET_VERSION)
> >
> > Great, do an additional open/read/close here for the version, I think
> > you will find it pretty trivial to do :)
> Right, it's trivial.... but will make userspace source code messier and bigger.
>
> Btw. I know we have powerful CPUs... but small wasting resources is
> still wasting resources... so we still need new CPUs :-).
So you keep your employer in business :)
Seriously, an ioctl for a hardware version number is total overkill
here. Your other ioctls are also suspect, please repost with the
description of why they are all needed, with documentation about the
user/kernel interface you have created here.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists