lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:19:27 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/07] dyn_array/nr_irqs/sparse_irq support v10 - fix * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 11:35 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > looks wrong - it should be unconditional (i've done that via the patch > > below). I dont remember why we made early_init_irq_lock_class() > > dependent on CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS before. Peter, do you have any > > memories? > > Nope, git suggests I poke you about it.. :-) muhaha - i dont even know that guy who did this sloppy commit 2 years ago - "Ingo Molnar", or however he is called. I believe my (mistaken) thinking would have been that desc->irq lockdep class does not matter as long as we dont do irq-tracing. Which might have been borderline correct then but is wrong now, for things like lockstat? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists