[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7d8f83e0808150337t5e699647wcc6ae296b3fa8c23@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:37:27 +1000
From: "Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@...il.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: "Kenneth Goldman" <kgoldman@...ibm.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > And what happens when the chip simply goes away due to a hotplug action?
>> > Or not even the actual chip goes away but just the chip driver and you
>> > now dereference freed memory?
>>
>> Being a TCG/TPM person, I can only address the first question. The
>> intent is that the TPM is soldered to the planar/motherboard (the TCG
>> uses the phrase "bound to the platform"). I can't imagine
>> any manufacturer designing a pluggable TPM. It would subvert PCR
>
> Only 2 TPMs I've seen were on pluggable modules... which was fortunate
> because they slowed down boot by 5+ minutes, and broke it completely
> in other cases. Nickname 'kurvitko' (aka useless trash that breaks
> stuff). They are currently lying under my table, disconnected.
>
> (OTOH they were not on PCI, but on some low-count pin header).
> Pavel
Remember even soldered on stuff can fail. How linux handles the
death of the TPM module needs to be covered.
Peter Dolding
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists