| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m3wsiiqzst.fsf@lugabout.jhcloos.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:31:55 -0400 From: James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Would it be better for git-commits-head to have -M -C diffs? >>>>> "David" == David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> writes: JimC> I think it would also be useful were the From: header of each JimC> message set to the commit's Author. I run each commit through a JimC> script to do that locally, but the archives would also benefit JimC> from that. David> It would be nice, but I'm not sure it's a good idea. They aren't David> always valid email addresses. Maybe a Reply-To: header, rather David> than From: ? I'd still need to pass them through the script I use; the point is to have the summary window in my MUA display useful names in the mail author column. Archive searching would also need it to be the From: header. They would, though, probably need a Reply-To:, MFT: or similar pointing replies to linux-kernel. I hadn't thought of that aspect until reading your reply.... I suppose the -M -C change would be enough for now. -JimC (still waking up) -- James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists