[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080815020400.GG13048@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:04:00 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@...stfloor.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, malware-list@...ts.printk.net,
malware-list-bounces@...sg.printk.net, peterz@...radead.org,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [malware-list] TALPA - a threat model? well sorta.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:44:33PM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> could you do something like defining a namespace inside posix attributes
> and then setting up a mechanism in the kernel to alert if the attributes
> change (with the entire namespace getting cleared if the file gets
> dirtied)?
According to Eric Paris the clean/dirty state is only stored in
memory. We could use the extended attribute interface as a way of not
defining a new system call, or some other interface, but I'm not sure
it's such a great match given that the extended attributes interface
are designed for persistent data.
I agree that doesn't actually work very well for the tracker use case,
where you the clean/dirty bit to be persistent (in case the tracker is
disabled due to the fact you are running on battery, for example, and
then you reboot).
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists