lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080815180048.GA26844@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:00:48 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	prarit@...hat.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, joro@...tes.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: PCI: GART iommu alignment fixes [v2]


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> 
> * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> 
> > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86 gart: allocate size-aligned address for alloc_coherent
> > 
> > This fixes GART to return a properly aligned address as
> > DMA-mapping.txt defines.
> 
> applied to tip/x86/gart, thanks! Any v2.6.27-urgency of this patch?

hm, -tip testing has found that this patch causes a hard hang during 
bootup:

 initcall ali_init+0x0/0x1b returned 0 after 3 msecs
 calling  amd_init+0x0/0x1b
 bus: 'pci': add driver pata_amd
 bus: 'pci': driver_probe_device: matched device 0000:00:06.0 with driver pata_amd
 bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver pata_amd with device 0000:00:06.0
 pata_amd 0000:00:06.0: version 0.3.10
 pata_amd 0000:00:06.0: setting latency timer to 64
 [hard hang]

should have continued with:

 scsi0 : pata_amd
 device: 'host0': device_add
 device: 'host0': device_add
 scsi1 : pata_amd
 [... etc. ... ]

on an AMD X2 testsystem. (Asus board) Can send more info on request. 
Config is:

  http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Fri_Aug_15_18_30_56_CEST_2008.bad

Any idea why that is so? Apparently the alignment change wasnt as benign 
as assumed.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ