[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080815155220.91ec8201.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:52:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, djohnson@...starentnetworks.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: cramfs and named-pipe
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:09:09 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:03:47 +0100, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > Eeek... I'd rather not play these games with directories and devices nodes
> > as well. Rationale for the original patch simply doesn't apply for those.
> >
> > IOW, I think it would be much saner if we did the following: make ..._test()
> > refuse to merge inodes with ->i_ino == 1, take inode setup back to
> > get_cramfs_inode() and make ->drop_inode() evict ones with ->i_ino == 1
> > immediately. Comments?
> >
> > Patch below is completely untested; it builds, but that's it.
>
> Thanks, your patch works well for me. But it looks a bit large for
> stable tree (100 line rule).
>
> With current code, I think no problem on empty directories and device
> nodes. So how about fixing only FIFO case first (and send it to
> stable tree) and then go to your patch?
>
Nothing seems to have happened. Al, do you think your (now tested) patch
is good for 2.6.27 and 2.6.26.x? And, it seems, 2.6.25.x. (All the way
down to 2.6.14.x!)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists