[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A608AF.5050307@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:52:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@...g.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: use only 5 byte nops for x86
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>> I think what we need to do is to test the NOPL instruction and create a
>> Linux-specific CPUID bit for it. I'll do that and submit to tip:x86/cpu.
>
> I also suspect that we'd really be much better off just fixing the generic
> NOP tables for the 5-byte nop. As far as I could tell, from all the
> numbers that have been posted, absolutely _none_ show that there is any
> point at all to the 2-instruction 3/2-byte sequence.
>
> So instead of having a magic special ftrace-only thing, why not just do it
> right, and fix the generic 5-byte nop sequence?
>
There is that, too. The two are orthogonal.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists