lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A4F3DA.9030200@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:11:22 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
CC:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 (sysfs/acpi errors)


>> It looks more like the high level code that sets up these parameters
>> broke somehow and starts registering these twice and now ACPI is the
>> first one to hit it (maybe because it starts with 'a' :-). 
> Perhaps we could try "acpi=off" and see if it still happens.

I doubt that would help because module_param()s are always registered
even with acpi=off. They are not really processed by ACPI, but by
kernel/params.c

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ