linux-kernel - Regression in 2.6.27-rc2 when cross-building the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:38:16 -0500
From:	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Regression in 2.6.27-rc2 when cross-building the kernel

One of my i386 systems used just for testing can take up to 18 hours 
to build a new kernel with about 200 modules. When performing a 
bisection, this gets rather tedious. As a result, I moved the kernel 
sources to an NFS volume, do the majority of the work as a cross-build 
on my x86_64 computer, and only switch to the slow machine to install 
the kernel and modules. Somewhere between 2.6.27-rc1 and -rc2, the 
module installation broke because the build leaves 
scripts/basic/fixdep as a 64-bit program that will not run on the 
32-bit system. Once I get to the i386 machine, I delete the two 
programs from scripts/basic/, manually rebuild them with a 'make 
scripts/basic/' and then do the final 'make modules_install install'.

Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/