[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1218847582.7576.6.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:46:22 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in lmb_enforce_memory_limit()
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:25 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:26:53 +1000
>
> > Perhaps after the first loop we should set memory_limit to equal
> > lmb_end_of_DRAM(), then the second loop should work as it is.
>
> Sounds great. Mind if I push the following to Linus?
Looks good to me.
I'll test it on Monday. I don't know if I have a system with memory
holes to test on, but I take it you do?
I notice some of our 32-bit code is using lmb_enforce_memory_limit() to
enforce an address limit, which is technically broken, but is probably
fine because it doesn't need to worry about holes.
> lmb: Fix reserved region handling in lmb_enforce_memory_limit().
>
> The idea of the implementation of this fix is from Michael Ellerman.
>
> This function has two loops, but they each interpret the memory_limit
> value differently. The first loop interprets it as a "size limit"
> whereas the second loop interprets it as an "address limit".
>
> Before the second loop runs, reset memory_limit to lmb_end_of_DRAM()
> so that it all works out.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists