linux-kernel - Re: PM_TRACE is no longer experimental

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200808171223.41893.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:23:41 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Trivial patch monkey <trivial@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: PM_TRACE is no longer experimental

On Sunday, 17 of August 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On 14.08.2008 17:18 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > PM_TRACE is stable for quite long. I don't think it needs to depend on
> > > experimental.
> > 
> > It might be stable, but its effect of trashing the RTC makes it unsuitable
> > for non-experimental use. Therefore I'd prefer the dependency be kept.
> 
> Given that it is enabled in both 32-bit and 64-bit defconfig, I don't
> think we can call it experimental.

I agree.

> Plus IIRC it needs command line option to thrash RTC.

That's correct.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/