[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808181812.17595.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:12:17 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: dirty page tracking race fix
On Monday 18 August 2008 18:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 18:03 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Monday 18 August 2008 17:49, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 07:38 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > It's possible to retain this optimization for page_referenced and
> > > > try_to_unmap.
> > >
> > > s/synch/sync/ ?
> > >
> > > we use sync all over the kernel to mean synchonous, so why are you
> > > inventing a new shorthand?
> >
> > Mmm, we also use synch all over the kernel to mean synchronous,
> > including in mm/, so I'm not inventing a new shorthand. sync I
> > see is more common, but it's not something anybody would get
> > confused about is it?
>
> I hadn't noticed before, and my grep skillz seem to have left me in the
> cold
>
> git grep "\<synch\>" mm/* | wc -l
> 0
"asynch" ;) 1 hit! So *technically* I'm wrong...
> And you're right, its not something one can get confused about. So lets
> just keep it unless someone else objects ;-)
Andrew feel free to edit the patch if/when you pick it up :P
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists