linux-kernel - Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219067529.2137.1.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:52:09 -0400
From:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To:	Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>
Cc:	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.16 released

On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:26 +0300, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> > Ext3 and XFS score somewhere between 10-15MB/s on the same test...
> 
> Interesting (and cool animations). 
> 
> We tried compilebench (-i 30 -r 0) just for fun using kernel 2.6.26, 
> freshly formatted partition, with defaults. Results:
> 
>               MB/s    Runtime (s)
>              -----    -----------
>   ext3       13.24        877
>   btrfs      12.33        793


Thanks for running things.

The code in the btrfs-unstable tree has all my performance fixes.
You'll need it to get good results.  Also, the MB/s number doesn't
include the time to run sync at the end, which is probably why the
runtime for btrfs is shorter but MB/s is lower.

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/