[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A98259.7030101@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:08:25 -0500
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
andi@...stfloor.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished
making slub perform as well
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> new patch is here.
>
> Index: b/mm/slub.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1326,9 +1326,11 @@ static struct page *get_any_partial(stru
> * expensive if we do it every time we are trying to find a slab
> * with available objects.
> */
> +#if 0
> if (!s->remote_node_defrag_ratio ||
> get_cycles() % 1024 > s->remote_node_defrag_ratio)
> return NULL;
> +#endif
>
> zonelist = node_zonelist(slab_node(current->mempolicy), flags);
> for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) {
Hmmm.... So always take from partial lists works? That is the same effect that
the setting of the remote_defrag_ratio to 100 should have had (its multiplied
by 10 when storing it).
So its a NUMA only phenomenon. How is performance affected?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists