[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080818142511.GC8184@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:25:11 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com
Cc: david@...g.hm, davecb@....com, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...il.com>, rmeijer@...all.nl,
Mihai Don??u <mdontu@...defender.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
malware-list@...ts.printk.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
malware-list-bounces@...sg.printk.net,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, capibara@...all.nl,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [malware-list] scanner interface proposal was: [TALPA] Intro
to a linux interface for on access scanning
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 02:15:24PM +0100, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com wrote:
> Then there is still a question of who allows some binary to declare itself
> exempt. If that decision was a mistake, or it gets compromised security
> will be off. A very powerful mechanism which must not be easily
> accessible. With a good cache your worries go away even without a scheme
> like this.
I have one word for you --- bittorrent. If you are downloading a very
large torrent (say approximately a gigabyte), and it contains many
pdf's that are say a few megabytes a piece, and things are coming in
tribbles, having either a indexing scanner or an AV scanner wake up
and rescan the file from scratch each time a tiny piece of the pdf
comes in is going to eat your machine alive....
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists