lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c0942db0808180731k7423df7ct75e3a27d404764d0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:31:05 -0700
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Christoph Lameter
<cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
>> Other regressions on other machines are similar.
>
> There are AIM7 regressions that are similar to tbench.
>
> 2.6.22  28436
> 2.6.26  23064

Just a shot in the dark -- is this with Group Scheduling on or off?
Off is prefered for benchmarks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ