[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A9BF9C.80108@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:29:48 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eran Liberty <liberty@...ricom.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: ftrace introduces instability into kernel 2.6.27(-rc2,-rc3)
Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> Should use a "b" constraint for %2, or you could get r0.
>
> I will make an updated patch.
>
>> Or, use an "m"
>> constraint with %U2%X2 after the lwz/stw.
>
> The 'b' seems easier ;-)
The advantage of the latter is that it allows GCC to choose indexed or
update instructions -- but that's merely an optimization. Switching to
"b" is enough to avoid the potential bug.
>> %1 also needs to be an early clobber.
>
> Not exactly sure what you mean by the above.
%1 is written to before some inputs are consumed, so you need to use
"=&r" rather than "=r" so that GCC won't use the same register for both.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists