linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long Physical Sectors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080818190431.GA21854@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:04:31 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Matt_Domsch@...l.com,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long Physical Sectors

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:06:29PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > +	static const char command_sect_size[256] = {
> > +		[ ATA_CMD_CFA_TRANSLATE_SECTOR ] = DEVICE,
> 
> Should be a bit array so we can do a single fast test_bit()

... err ... any idea what the syntax might be for initialising a bit
array at compile time?  Do I have to use an initialiser function at
runtime?

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/