[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080818142953.a250c30d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:29:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: vegard.nossum@...il.com, pavel@...e.cz, robert.richter@....com,
mingo@...e.hu, ak@...ux.intel.com, phil.el@...adoo.fr,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:59 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Monday, 18 of August 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > Apparently nmi_suspend() conflicts with oprofile somehow. Also, the offlining
> > > of non-boot CPUs may confuse it. It would be helpful to check if the CPU
> > > hotplug works with oprofile.
> >
> > That is a good suggestion :-)
> >
> > Here is offlining:
> >
> > CPU 1 is now offline
> > lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
> > SMP alternatives: switching to UP code
> > CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > CPU1 attaching NULL sched-domain.
> > CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> > domain 0: span 0 level CPU
> > groups: 0
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > [repeat last message indefinitely]
> >
> > Here is onlining:
> >
> > Booting processor 1/1 ip 6000
> > Initializing CPU#1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5986.15 BogoMIPS (lpj=29930790)
> > CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 16K
> > CPU: L2 cache: 2048K
> > CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
> > Intel machine check architecture supported.
> > Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1.
> > CPU1: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (24) available
> > CPU1: Thermal monitoring enabled
> > x86 PAT enabled: cpu 1, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> > CPU1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 05
> > checking TSC synchronization [CPU#0 -> CPU#1]:
> > Measured 120 cycles TSC warp between CPUs, turning off TSC clock.
> > Marking TSC unstable due to check_tsc_sync_source failed
> > APIC error on CPU1: 00(40)
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode:<7>APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > lapic is not functional.
> > Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 0
> > Clockevents: could not switch to one-shot mode: lapic is not functional.
> > Could not switch to high resolution mode on CPU 1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [sched domains messages
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [repeat last message 9 times]
> >
> > Then follows this pattern indefinitely:
> >
> > WQ on CPU0, prefer CPU1
> > APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
> > [repeat last message 9 times]
> >
> > That's basically the same thing as I saw with suspend. So it can be
> > reproduced easily with CPU hotplug.
>
> Well, I don't know who's the right person to ask about the CPU hotplug.
> Andrew, can you help please?
>
The CPU hotplug maintainer is basically "everyone", because many
subsystems need to interact correctly with hotplugging, and many
subsystems can break it.
This one looks like a clocksource/apic/resume problem? Probably the
next port of call would be Thomas, with Robert looking on.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists