[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48A9EC07.8000707@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:39:19 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Xen: Fix memory access violation bug when CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
is enabled
Alex Nixon wrote:
> From: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:15:11 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Xen: Fix memory access violation bug when CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is enabled
>
> When sparse IRQs are enabled, it is not safe to assume an IRQ descriptor exists for every possible IRQ. This patch causes init_evtchn_cpu_bindings to skip initialisation of IRQ descriptors which don't exist.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
>
Thanks again, Alex.
Ingo, please apply.
Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> ---
> drivers/xen/events.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index 74dca12..6e7e765 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static void init_evtchn_cpu_bindings(void)
> /* By default all event channels notify CPU#0. */
> for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
> struct irq_desc *desc = to_irq_desc(i);
> + if (!desc)
> + continue;
> desc->affinity = cpumask_of_cpu(0);
> }
> #endif
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists