[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <patchbomb.1219083817@localhost>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:23:37 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 9] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes to use
function calls [POST 2]
This series:
- adds a simple debugfs profiling entry for cross-cpu tlb flushes
- converts them to using smp_call_function_mask
- unifies 32 and 64-bit tlb flushes
- converts smp_call_function to using multiple queues (using the now
freed vectors)
- allows config-time adjustment of the number of queues
- adds a kernel parameter to disable multi-queue in case it causes
problems
The main concern is whether using smp_call_function adds an
unacceptible performance hit to cross-cpu tlb flushes. My limited
measurements show a ~35% regression in latency for a particular flush;
it would be interesting to try this on a wider range of hardware. I
gather the effect tlb flush performance is very application specific
as well, but I'm not sure what benchmarks show what effects.
Trading off agains the latency of a given flush, the smp_function_call
mechanism allows multiple requests to be queued, and so may improve
throughput on a system-wide basis.
So, I'd like people to try this out and see what performance effects it
has.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists